ISSN 2284-7995, ISSN Online 2285-3952


Published in Scientific Papers. Series "Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and rural development", Vol. 16 ISSUE 2
Written by Duygu AKTÜRK, Ferhan SAVRAN, Elif YÖRÜSÜN, Elif DURAK

The present study was conducted to compare two different accounting systems (Laur Accounting System and Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) used to put forth activity outcomes of agricultural enterprises. These two systems were used to classify cost and income items of agricultural enterprises and calculation methods were compared. The survey data gathered through questionnaires made with selected enterprises constituted the material of the present study. Current findings revealed that different accounting system used to put forth annual activity outcomes of agricultural enterprises classified enterprise income and cost items in different fashions. In Laur Accounting System, enterprise costs are classified as fixed and variable costs. On the other hand in FADN system, costs are classified as intermediate consumption, amortizations and external costs. In Laur acciounting system, enterprise success criteria are considered as gross profit, net product and agricultural income. On the other hand in FADN system, gross enterprise profit, enterprise net value-added and enterprise family income are considered as the success criteria.

[Read full article] [Citation]

The publisher is not responsible for the opinions published in the Volume. They represent the authors’ point of view.

© 2019 To be cited: Scientific Papers. Series “Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development“.

Powered by INTELIDEV